Search Results

York Consulting were commissioned by the Department for Education and Skills (DfES) to evaluate the impact of the Learning Partnerships established across the United Kingdom (UK) in early 1999. The partnerships were designed to promote a new culture of provider collaboration across the educational sectors (schools, further education, work-based learning, and adult and community learning) and to rationalise the range of existing local partnerships arrangements covering post-16 learning. This interim report provides an analysis of interim progress and early impact of Learning Partnerships as at May 2001. The report is based on a review of management information, Learning Plan Executive Summaries, national case studies and regional evaluations. The final evaluation report which will be published early in 2003. The first part of the report outlines the key findings and issues from national data and the national Learning Partnerships database developed by the research team and based on Learning Plan Executive Summaries. The second part analyses the key findings from the 20 national case studies and regional evaluation reports and the final section draws together the research findings to present conclusions and key recommendations. The findings demonstrate that although progress and impact in relation to partnership is being achieved, Learning Partnerships continue to face a number of potential constraints.

Other related reports are indexed from TD/TNC 69.278 to TD/TNC 69.280 and the final report is indexed at TD/TNC 75.237. Show less

Foundation degrees (FDs) were established as a pathway for people within the workplace to build on existing expertise and continue working at the same time as studying for a higher level qualification. One of the FDs developed was in the Early Years (EY) sector. The Early Years Sector-Endorsed Foundation Degree (EYSEFD) comprises practical experience in an EY workplace, supported by a mentor, which constitutes the work-based learning (WBL) element of the course, in conjunction with academic work. This report presents the findings of a qualitative study exploring employers' and mentors' views and experiences of the EYSEFD, specifically: the nature of information employers and mentors have received about the program and their levels of satisfaction with this; how employers and mentors conceptualise their roles in relation to the EYSEFD students, particularly in relation to WBL and mentoring; the types and levels of involvement of employers and mentors with EYSEFD students, and explanatory factors for this; employer and mentor motivations for supporting the student through the EYSEFD, and feelings about their role; the logistics of accommodating an EYSEFD student in the workplace in terms of WBL, mentoring, and finances; impacts of the EYSEFD on students' work, the setting, other staff members, the EY sector as a whole and the students' future career progression; and employer and mentor views about the value of the EYSEFD to their setting, and feelings about how the experience of accommodating and mentoring an EYSEFD student could be improved. Employers experienced a range of 'de-motivators' and 'motivators' to supporting EYSEFD students. The key 'de-motivators' included: a lack of information and contact with the college about the EYSEFD and the role of employers and mentors in facilitating the WBL aspect; logistical and financial difficulties in accommodating WBL, mentoring and student attendance at college; and lack of progression opportunities within the setting. Key 'motivators' included: a strong commitment on the part of the employer to staff training; the ability to accommodate the EYSEFD logistically and financially; and confidence in the degree strengthened by good information from the college.

The report of the study of students' experiences of the EYSEFD is indexed at TD/TNC 85.381. Show less

The 14-19 pathfinders are part of a broader process of reforming the 14-19 phase of learning proposed in the 2002 Department for Education and Skills (DfES) Green Paper, ‘14-19: extending opportunities, raising standards’ (indexed at TD/IRD 88.170). The pathfinders were intended to: test ideas; develop best practice in 14-19 education and training; identify how 14-19 policy will interact with other policies; identify barriers to a coherent 14-19 phase and propose ways to address them; demonstrate that a coherent 14-19 phase can be achieved nationally in the UK despite the diversity of participants and locations. This report provides a national evaluation of the first year of the phase one 14-19 pathfinders. It describes the progress of the 25 pathfinders and a number of partnerships not funded through the pathfinder program. As the pathfinders are in the early stages of development, the report focuses on objectives, plans and early developments rather than changes in student experience. The pathfinders are characterised by diversity in response to local needs and goals. Positive progress has been made in many aspects of development. These include: collaborative arrangements; the development of curricula offering more choice and flexibility and involving vocational and work-related learning in colleges, training providers and workplaces; provision for changes in the pace of learning for higher achieving students; improved advice and guidance for young people approaching and moving through the 14-19 phase; and productive links with other programs and further development of strategic planning of the 14-19 phase. Show less

This publication is designed to provide practical advice and support for teachers in centres who are developing their learners’ employability skills through work-related learning and enterprise. Its purpose is to show how key skills can be used to structure the development of employability skills at Key Stage 4 and post-16. This publication explains how key skills qualifications can be used to accredit the outcomes of work-related learning and enterprise.

Published summary. Show less

The Increased Flexibility for 14-16 year olds Programme (IFP) was introduced in 2002 by the UK Department for Education and Skills (DfES) in order to ‘create enhanced vocational and work-related learning opportunities for 14-16 year olds who can benefit most’. Partnerships between schools and colleges and training providers were formed and two cohorts of Year 10 students began two-year vocational courses including National Vocational Qualifications (NVQs), other Vocational Qualifications (VQs) and new General Certificate in Secondary Education (GCSEs) in vocational subjects. The partnerships aimed to enhance student attainment, develop their skills, knowledge and social learning, and increase retention in education and training after 16. The National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER) was commissioned by the DfES to conduct an evaluation of the first and second cohorts of IFP students. The evaluation aims to: assess the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the implementation of the IFP, and identify those delivery models and implementation practices and strategies that appear to be most successful; evaluate the extent to which the IFP has fulfilled its national aims, objectives and targets; and assess the impact of vocational qualifications and new work-related learning opportunities on young peoples’ skills, knowledge, attitudes, attendance, attainment and post-16 progression. This report presents a profile of the partnerships between schools and colleges that were established to deliver the IFP to Year 10 students in 2003. It outlines the characteristics of the students who were participating and the qualifications they studied. This is the second cohort of students participating in IFP and comparisons with the first cohort are provided throughout the report.

Other reports from the evaluation are indexed at TD/TNC 77.125, TD/TNC 80.651 and TD/TNC 80.678. Show less

Learning Partnerships were set up across the United Kingdom (UK) in early 1999 to promote a new culture across the school, further education (FE) work-based learning, and adult and community learning sectors to rationalise the range of existing local partnership arrangements covering post-16 learning. This analysis, which is based on 20 case studies, provides an overview of key issues associated with progress, early impact and added value of Partnership Activity. It concentrates on the focus, performance and impact aspects of Partnership development and draws interim conclusions and recommendations. The contents are: Introduction; Partnership focus; Aspects of success; Barriers to development; Value added; Performance indicators; Conclusions and recommendations.

Other related reports are indexed at TD/TNC 68.196, TD/TNC 69.278 and TD/TNC 69.279 and the final report is indexed at TD/TNC 75.237. Show less

The Increased Flexibility for 14-16 year olds Programme (IFP) was introduced in 2002 by the UK Department for Education and Skills (DfES) in order to 'create enhanced vocational and work-related learning opportunities for 14-16 year olds who can benefit most'. Partnerships between schools and colleges and training providers were formed and two cohorts of Year 10 students began two-year vocational courses including National Vocational Qualifications (NVQs), other Vocational Qualifications (VQs) and new General Certificate in Secondary Education (GCSEs) in vocational subjects. The partnerships aimed to enhance student attainment, develop their skills, knowledge and social learning, and increase retention in education and training after 16. The National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER) was commissioned by the DfES to conduct an evaluation of the first and second cohorts of IFP students. This report focuses on the outcomes for participants who participated in the programme between 2003 and 2005 (second cohort) during a time of change in 14 to 19 policy. The evaluation of the second cohort of IFP participants aimed to: evaluate the extent to which the IFP has fulfilled its national aims, objectives and targets; and assess the impact of vocational qualifications and new work-related learning opportunities on young people’s attainment and post-16 progression. Overall, the majority of participants in the second cohort had achieved their qualifications in line with expectations based on their prior attainment and other background and school-level characteristics. The majority (87 per cent) of the representative sample of young people had progressed onto further education or training after completing their involvement in IFP. Implications for policy and practice are proposed in relation to: sustaining progression; provision of appropriate qualification types; English and mathematics provision within the IFP programmes; addressing discontinuation; and location of study.

Other reports from the evaluation are indexed at TD/TNC 77.125, TD/TNC 80.651, TD/TNC 80.678 and TD/TNC 80.679. Show less

This is the final report produced for the National Evaluation of Learning Partnerships. It provides a final assessment after three and a half years of development and looks to the future and the role of learning partnerships in lifelong learning. At the core of the evaluation process is a set of longitudinal case studies undertaken with 20 learning partnerships. The case studies involved discussions with the chairs, directors, managers and co-ordinators of learning partnerships, with key partners and stakeholders from all sectors and were complemented by analyses of the national learning targets, discussion with government offices and regional evaluators, assessment of partnership plans, evaluations and progress reports and performance data. The study found that progress had been slower in some areas than others and the failure to lock the program firmly into the national policy context encouraged perceptions of the program to be a failed and forgotten initiative. Some of the partnerships felt from the beginning that as voluntary organisations they were not able to deal with the more strategic roles they were initially given. The main barriers encountered were around clarity of purpose, capacity to deliver and stakeholder credibility. However, the vase majority of learning partnerships have been able to demonstrate aspects of added value by increasing the level and amount of working and information sharing across partner organisations and sectors.

Other related reports are indexed at TD/TNC 68.196, TD/TNC 69.278, TD/TNC 69.279 and TD/TNC 69.280. Show less

The Increased Flexibilities for 14-16 year olds Programme (IFP) was introduced in the UK in 2002 to ‘create enhanced vocational and work-related learning opportunities for 14-16 year olds of all abilities who can benefit most’. Partnerships between schools and external providers were formed during the first year of IFP to achieve this goal. Each partnership involved a ‘lead partner’, generally a further education (FE) college, with funding provided through Local Learning and Skills Councils (LLSCs). In the same year, the Department for Education and Skills (DfES) commissioned the National Foundation for Education Research (NFER) to undertake a national evaluation of IFP to: (1) assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of its implementation; (2) identify delivery models and aspects of implementation that are most successful; (3) evaluate the extent to which IFP has realised its objectives; and (4) assess the impact of vocational qualifications and new work-related learning opportunities on the skills, knowledge, attitudes, attendance, attainment and post-16 progression of participants. As the first cohort of participants are continuing their qualifications at the end of the first year of implementation, the findings focus particularly on the strategic and operational implementation of IFP, including managing the program within the school, working in partnership, equality of access to IFP courses, and delivery of IFP. Some issues to arise include transporting students to their location of study, additional time for IFP coordinators to maintain contact with partner organisations, funding, and the identification of students to participate in IFP. Although students were only part way through their first year of IFP, the evaluation revealed positive outcomes from gaining access to a wider and more appropriate curriculum. Show less

This eighth edition of ‘Education and training statistics for the United Kingdom’ uses over 50 tables to provide an integrated overview of statistics on education and training in the UK. It covers: expenditure; schools; post-compulsory education and training; qualifications and destinations; population; and international comparisons. Key facts reported under ‘Post-compulsory education and training’ include: in 2001/02, 72% of 16 year olds and 58% of 17 year olds were in post-compulsory education either at school or in full-time further education; there were 47,300 new starts on Advanced Modern Apprenticeship schemes (AMAs) in England in 2002/3; the average number of learners on AMAs in 2002/3 was 108,300, representing almost two-fifths of the average year for the total number of learners on work-based learning for young people; people with high levels of qualifications were much more likely than those with low or no qualifications to have received job-related training; the economically inactive tend to receive job-related training of a longer duration than that received by employees; and a further education college or university is the most common location for off-the-job training. Show less