Challenges in the work of recognition: validation of prior learning

The Nordic Network for Adult Learning (NVL) expert network regarding validation has been asked to identify common Nordic challenges in the field of validation. This memorandum is based on national reports from Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden which were prepared during the spring of 2009. Besides identifying common challenges this memorandum points out which common challenges can be addressed at a Nordic level. It is also suggested how the challenges can be examined and developed through common Nordic dialogues and initiatives. Regarding the use of concepts, no common Nordic...  [+] Show more

The Nordic Network for Adult Learning (NVL) expert network regarding validation has been asked to identify common Nordic challenges in the field of validation. This memorandum is based on national reports from Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden which were prepared during the spring of 2009. Besides identifying common challenges this memorandum points out which common challenges can be addressed at a Nordic level. It is also suggested how the challenges can be examined and developed through common Nordic dialogues and initiatives. Regarding the use of concepts, no common Nordic terminology exists in the field of validation. In this memorandum we have chosen to use the abbreviations RPL (recognition of prior learning) and VPL (validation of prior learning) combined to give R/VPL. RPL refers to the Norwegian and Danish terminology, while VPL describes the same phenomenon in Sweden. The Nordic countries share a strong tradition of adult education and thus have an infrastructure in which R/VPL is relevant and useful. Accordingly, addressing R/VPL has a high priority in all the Nordic countries. However, several different approaches exist with regard to policy development, systems and solutions as well as practical implementation. Between the countries you will find variations in the state of the art regarding R/VPL. Some countries are still in the projects and preparations phase, others have enacted legislation and are striving to implement it, while yet others have established a more consolidated system. In spite of the different approaches and stages in the implementation of R/VPL, thematic similarities emerged between the challenges pointed out in the national reports. Thus it is possible to identify a number of challenges common to all the Nordic countries. It is evident that developing the field of R/VPL is a complex and time-consuming process requiring many resources of a political, economic and professional character.