Search results

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to identify two contrasting, yet successful, ways of conducting CPD [continuing professional development] training specific to the regeneration sector; looking at the different delivery methods of the two courses and the benefits associated with each. Design/methodology/approach - The paper provides an overview and analysis of contrasting courses available through Coventry University and the University of Salford through literature and participants' experience. Findings - For professionals in the regeneration sector traditional CPD courses from HE [higher education] institutions are not the most effective. Regeneration covers a variety of different activities and is practically based; as a result flexible work based courses are more effective. Two contrasting examples of effective delivery methods are individual study based around existing projects and workplace based training to support tailored company development. Originality/value - This paper will be of interest to regeneration professionals, managers and HR officers looking for effective ways to develop the workforce while maintaining business relevance. It looks at two new courses which take different approaches to work-based CPD and discusses the differences and benefits of the two.